|
|
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [CVEPRI] Increasing numbers and timeliness of candidates
Steve, I also will pipe up with a 'me too'. However monthly updates are fine by me. Otherwise the work becomes a bit much. On Mon, 6 May 2002, Mike Prosser wrote: > Steve, > Sorry for late response, have been traveling. Timeliness is important, > especially now that CVE has become pretty well known not just in the > security community but by the "end users" as well. I tend to agree with > the more frequent updates as opposed to the dump of many, it is easier to > coordinate and respond. > > -mike > > > |---------+----------------------------------------------> > | | "Steven M. Christey" | > | | <coley@LINUS.MITRE.ORG> | > | | Sent by: | > | | owner-cve-editorial-board-list@list| > | | s.mitre.org | > | | | > | | | > | | 05/02/2002 04:34 PM | > | | | > |---------+----------------------------------------------> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > | | > | To: cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org | > | cc: | > | Subject: Re: [CVEPRI] Increasing numbers and timeliness of candidates | > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| > > > > > All, > > I know that some Board members do not want to pipe up and say "me too" > if they agree with what other members have already said. > > In this case, though, it is important enough that I would like to get > everyone's feedback, preferably on this list, but privately at the > least. > > In a nutshell, it comes down to (a) do you believe that CVE timeliness > is important, (b) are you willing to live with a little more "noise" > as a result of improved timeliness, (c) are monthly updates frequent > enough, and (d) if not, then how frequent would you like the updates > to be? > > Thanks, > - Steve > VP Engineering SecurityFocus "Vae Victis"
|
||||
