[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: FINAL version of CyberCrime Treaty statement - ready for sign atures
I think we all understand your and Andy's predicament Kevin. I, and probably others, needed at least a basic approval to use my position in signing this even with the disclaimer that I was not representing my company in doing so. -mike -----Original Message----- From: Kevin J. Ziese [mailto:ziese@CISCO.COM] Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2000 1:00 PM To: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: RE: FINAL version of CyberCrime Treaty statement - ready for signatures Everyone, All the recent signings have really highlighted just how important our affiliations are to our letter. Signing the letter without our affiliations wouldn't strengthen the letter; in fact we think it would detract from it. We're in something of a Catch-22 because we can't sign the letter with our positions and/or affiliations without a priori coporate OK. We remain in complete and total agreement with the thoughts and views expressed in the Treaty Condemnation Letter, we just can't sign it. Kevin J. Ziese, Computer Scientist Andy Balinsky, Network Security Engineer Critical Infrastructures Assurance Group Security Technologies Assessment Team Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc.