|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: Cybercrime treaty
On Mon, May 08, 2000 at 01:24:04PM -0400, Steven M. Christey wrote: | One Board member has since sent me an email saying that they are | concerned with the Editorial Board as a whole making a statement, | although they personally agree with what is being said. The member's | concern appears to be related to the fact that if "the Board" makes a | statement, then the member's organization may be viewed as agreeing | with the statement by association. | | A different member sent me an email saying that while the member | agrees with the concerns, they cannot comment publicly on this, | especially while their own organization may be pursuing this issue | independently. But this member did not seem to be concerned with how | a Board statement would reflect on their own organization. | | So it seems to me that it may not be appropriate to have a statement | from the Board as a whole. I think that part of this is due to the | fact that we don't formalize whether Board members are speaking for | themselves or for their organizations. | | I think we could work with the introductory text that Stuart provided, | and say that the statement is a result of Editorial Board discussions, | and advocated by various Board members, but it is not a statement by | the full Board itself. Individuals who are not comfortable with | speaking for their organization could provide feedback behind the | scenes, or be listed on the statement without their organizational | affiliation. Having talked with my lobbying folks on this, they say that a statement by the board is a much stronger tool to present to the COE, and that a statement which headlines that the board could not agree has less of an impact. Steve, could you ask those who question a board statement if they'd be more willing to accept a disclaimer within the text, such as: "In our capacity as security experts, <Treaty> has recently come to our attention, and we have some concerns about it, specifically Article 6." Or at the bottom: "Affiliations are listed here for identification purposes only." This allows a board statement to be made without drawing in all of the organizations which we may or may not represent. Adam -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume
|
||||