RE: [CVEPRI] CVE Version 20000104 Published - and Our Next Steps
I tend to agree with Andre, an Editorial Board announcement from MITRE would
seem to be sufficient to me.
From: Frech, Andre (ISSAtlanta) [mailto:AFrech@ISS.NET]
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 3:56 PM
To: 'Steven M. Christey'; email@example.com
Subject: RE: [CVEPRI] CVE Version 20000104 Published - and Our Next
What do you mean by a 'coordinated announcement'? While we're excited about
meeting the milestone and using candidates in our work, an announcement from
each of our organizations would seem like overkill.
Were you referring to a coordinated announcement from the editorial board,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven M. Christey [mailto:coley@LINUS.MITRE.ORG]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2000 4:24 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [CVEPRI] CVE Version 20000104 Published - and Our Next Steps
> CVE version 2000104 has been published on http://cve.mitre.org
> Dave Mann has suggested that once CVE has reached 500 entries and we
> have gone live with candidates, it might be a good opportunity for
> Board members to make a coordinated announcement to the public. At
> this time, we are planning on including candidates on the CVE web site
> around January 18.
> For us to reach 500 entries, at least 27 more candidates will need to
> be approved. This will require more votes from the Board. We may not
> be able to reach this by January 18, due to the 4-day lag time between
> Interim and Final Decision. I will post vote summaries on various
> clusters later today to help this effort.
> What do people think of a coordinated announcement for reporting on
> the 500-entry CVE milestone, and announcing the use of candidates?
> - Steve