[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: CD PROPOSAL: HIGHCARD (Interim Decision 8/24)
I said: > >I would propose an ad hoc decision of the board concerning the > >treatment (inclusion, exclusion, or whatever other actions) of any of > >the 'slippery slope' class of high cardinality issues that > aren't high > >now, but might most likely be large in the near future. Steven Christey said: > This makes sense to me, but hopefully we won't encounter these > situations very often. Do you have a particular example in mind? The example we mentioned in the meeting was 'weak' encryption. Currently there are only a few, but more and more protocols or standards will be broken as the technology gets better. > So, maybe we should only consider High Cardinality after we've made > distinctions using other content decisions. That sounds good to me. It should hepl to eliminate a good majority of these situations.